|
| |
Forensic Video Image Enhancement
A Technology Discussion
Forensic
Video Image Analysis is a process of investigation and courtroom presentation practiced by law enforcement,
industrial security, surveillance, digital image processing technical service officers and the
judiciary. It is a new scientific tool for enhancement and identification of
individuals and situations in both good quality and poorly recorded video crime scenes, emerging as a cost-effective, courtroom acceptable image analysis technology. It is an acceptable scientific procedure for presenting analyzed
evidence which satisfies Frye,
Daubert
and Federal Rule 702 criteria, and is available to the
crime laboratory
technical service officer (as in forensic audio, photography, forensic toxicology,
etc.)
in a turnkey SPvI
Workstation environment. In addition, the analysis (enhancement) VIP
Service is accessible as an overnight service bureau function via courier and/or
air
express with an audit signature trail. Whatever the access, the technology produces
inexpensive high resolution hardcopy images for wide spread distribution, e.g., BOLA's, roll call, the interview room, witness identification, and provides VHS video tapes for television broadcast, e.g., Crime Stoppers, the
Nightly News. Other features include photographic quality 16" by 24" foam board hardcopy, very high resolution 35 mm slides for large screen display, Power
Point Slide Shows, and slower than real time video playback for thorough counsel discussion on 32"
large screen monitors for juror
viewing. The technology addresses the following problems found in both good
and poor
quality video recorded incidences.
Video Problems encountered from crime scene incidences solved by TREC's Forensic Video Image Analysis
-
Quad camera scenes per single video frame which preclude full camera views, instead of each quadrant optical quality digitally magnified to a full frame;
-
Perpetrator too small to identify or too distant from the camera, instead of optical quality digital magnification of the area of interest times two X2, times four X4 and even
times eight X8 (a TRECWare solution of the classical problem of aliasing, stair stepping diagonals, curves or blockiness in digital enlargement times two or larger);
-
Motion blur due to perpetrator running through the field of view, instead of splitting the blurred frame into separate fields which almost by definition have no motion blur, then then optical quality
vertical magnification of either field into a full non motion blur frame (a TRECWare solution to this classical problem)
-
Image blur from lens poorly focused or coated with dirt, dust, and grime, instead of user adjustable resolution enhancement to reduce or eliminate blur;
-
Poor alphanumeric legibility, e.g., license plate, logos, patches, etc., instead of user adjustable resolution enhancement for improved sharpness with less blur;
-
Corrupted video fields or frames from rarely maintained or seldom serviced VCR’s;
-
Field recorded time lapse video viewed on frame display monitors, images seconds apart interlaced confusing;
-
Ghost perpetrators within frames, i.e., recorded in one field only, with fields seconds apart, the resulting frame having the perpetrator in every other line and difficult to identify; instead of
splitting the frame into separate fields then optical quality vertical magnification of the field of interest into a full frame;
-
Wavy distortion, video tear, poor sync signals, or time base distortion, rolling unstable images, instead of splitting the blurred images into fields having no blur then optical quality vertical
magnification into a stable frame;
-
Lack of intensity and contrast due to over used or poor quality video tape, worn out magnetic media, instead of intensity adjusted contrast and brightness in linear and non-linear modes;
-
Dark noisy environments, low light levels, poorly lit perpetrators, black on black, instead of frequency sensitive user selectable digital noise filters with no noticeable loss of image detail and non-linear
intensity adjustment for seeing into black on black areas of interest;
-
Incorrect or no azimuth on playback VCR’s for azimuth recorded VCR tapes resulting in overlapped noisy images, inserted of user selectable azimuth selection on playback VCR's;
-
Blocky/blurry enlargement of the areas of interest by the computer at X2, X4, or X8 magnification, produced by classical image analysis techniques, instead of optical
quality digital magnification enlarging areas of interest by the computer at X2, X4, or X8 magnification;
-
Video tape sections edited, cut, merged, erased, or tampered with in any fashion;
-
Difficult tape authenticity proof, is it a copy or an original, instead of clearly defined/displayed field switch points, where possible;
-
Difficult courtroom video environments for counsel, judges, and juries, poor equipment, small screen monitors, tape controller timeout blackouts, instead of a large screen 32" monitor for the jury, high
resolution monitors for the judge and opposing counsel all with time base correction, wide bandpath distribution and manual advance/backup of selected enhanced/crime scene images;
-
Low resolution laser jet hardcopy, e.g., 600 dpi (dots per inch half tone) equivalent to 37.5 lpi (lines per inch screen frequency continuous tone) for 256 shades of gray or 1200 dpi with 75 lpi
producing blockiness, blotchy areas, stair stepping diagonal lines, jaggedness, half tone printing; instead of glossy photographic quality 300 lpi continuous tone line screen dye sublimation prints with 256 shades of gray;
-
Computer Monitor VGA (Video Graphics Adapters) gray scale images with only 64 shades of gray, instead of 256 shades, {VGA/SVGA Adapters have upwards to millions of colors but only 64 shades of any one color,
i.e., gray. This is due to the six bit DAC's, digital to analogue converters, used in most VGA adapter cards.}
|